|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See info on the web about
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
During the last two decades, Inyo and Los
Angeles have negotiated historically unprecedented legal
agreements that allow for joint management of water and land in
the Owens Valley.
 |
|
| photo by Ceal Klingler |
|
These agreements, including the Inyo-Los
Angeles Water Agreement and a 1997 Memorandum
of Understanding between the City of Los Angeles, Inyo County,
the Owens Valley Committee, Carla Scheidlinger, the Sierra Club,
the California Department of Fish and Game, and the State Lands
Commission, have led to joint projects for
saltcedar control,
revegetation
of LADWP areas damaged by previous management, mitigation of
environmental damage in some areas by revegetating others, recovery
of drought-damaged areas, rewatering a 60-mile stretch of the
lower Owens River (original river flow was diverted to the first
Los Angeles aqueduct in 1913)(see also LORP
and
LORP map),
and monitoring
of and reporting on the condition of natural resources in or on
LADWP-owned lands.
Unfortunately,
legal agreements can't solve everything.
For the last
several years, LADWP has consistently failed to meet deadlines
established in the Agreement and MOU, especially those concerning
mitigation
and the preparation of a LORP Environmental Impact Report that
adequately describes the Lower Owens River Project. In addition, Los Angeles continues
to pump groundwater at a rate
that is still harmful to the Owens Valley. And, finally, Inyo County has not adequately
funded its own water department (Inyo County Water Department
), the
only governmental agency that stands between the Owens Valley and
Los Angeles.
The
Owens Valley Committee strongly supports citizen oversight of the
implementation of both the Inyo-Los Angeles agreement and the MOU,
as well as citizen oversight of long-term land and water
management policies. It's also important for local residents to
ensure that Inyo County does not undermine its own standing by
underfunding our water department, creating policies that are
inconsistent with the MOU, or allowing LADWP to renege on its
legal obligations.
|